Past and Present Times

In the 1920's women were starting to get their own rights and freedoms in society because the roles of women were changing.  Women have had to work for their rights for so long, but during the '20's in America they were able to be depicted as strong and independent.  Although they were seen differently it was becoming accepted that women could do perfectly fine with out a man. Even though if they went out and had drinks they were described as "loose" women, which as we all know led to the era of the flappers.


The same concept is true nowadays, society accepts that women can live without someone of the opposite sex and they can be independent, but if they choose to live that sort of life then they are usually mocked and made fun of especially in the entertainment business. They are described as annoying and bossy even though it's inaccurate to generalize because no two people are alike.  It seems as though anything that a female does will be mocked or will be gossiped about, even though that way of thinking is backwards.  The advertisements that were focused on women during the 1920's is extremely similar to the ads that women in the 21st century face.  This is because they focus on what the ideal woman should be like and not what the everyday woman is like.  Most of the products that are from the 1920's advertise for weight-loss/gain or cigarettes (because "cool and stylish" people smoke cigarettes).  It's interesting to see how ads in our time use these techniques to try to get women to buy their products, just as they did in the '20's.


We need to eliminate these false views of women and make them equal to men once again.  We've become, as a society, more hateful towards female empowerment and that needs to change. Girls in developing countries are growing up with out the education that teaches them that females and males are equal, but in the US we have the information and the means of distributing the knowledge but we are not, for some reason, distributing it out to the youth of America.  We need to start teaching everyone that men and women are equal and they should share the same responsibilities. If I know this then why shouldn't everyone else?

Rules or Rebels

Do we need rules for every single thing in the world? A set guideline to follow when we're lost?  The rules of punctuation "provide" for us just that, but instead of helping us it's limiting us in an ever-changing society.  There is supposedly a set list of punctuation rules in the English language, but this is false; we pretend to know every single punctuation rule in the English language, but this is practically impossible-- there are too many.  We cannot continue this charade of pretending to know everything when it's clearly false.  The rules of punctuation are limiting and suffocating. We need to be able to express ourselves when we write. I'm not saying that we should get rid of every. single. punctuation. rule. ever. but we don't need half the comma rules that are in existence today. It seems pointless, to try to argue over something that probably will not change even though it needs to.  Also, we've changed these rules before and let them evolve in their respective societies.  Do you really think the English language hasn't evolved since 1066? Well, guess what, it has changed. So being opposed to changing the rules doesn't make sense at all, since they will eventually change to fit our society better. Always question the man, in this case it's punctuation.

Double-Takes

Don't you just hate it when something happens and it didn't go as expected? And you catch yourself asking whether what you just saw or read actually happened? That was what happened to me at the end of The Scarlet Letter.  I had to do a "double-take" because my reaction to completing it was "Wait, what? why?" Dimmesdale dies at the end. *spoiler alert* I should've put that at the beginning, but shame on you for slacking if you didn't know that!

This happens in everyday life too! A couple of weekends ago, the Saints vs Patriots game was on and until the last 5 seconds in the game, the Saints were leading. It was at the 5 second mark that a miracle shot was threw by Tom Brady and somehow it was caught and it was"legal" and they "beat" the best team in pro-football by 3 points.  This is another example of a time that I had to do a double-take, because it was just so ridiculous that a lucky shot actually caused a touchdown in the last 5 seconds of the game! Another time I had a double-take was just today while watching the MTV EMA's, I was watching to see who won the Worldwide Act and when they announced "Chris Lee" I was in shock. She wasn't a favorite and honestly everyone is confused as to how it happened, because there were 2 favorites and an underdog favorite! One Direction and Justin Bieber were the two favorites, but the Kpop group EXO (best artists ever, like seriously though) had an amazing shot at winning this year despite only having only been here for a year!  The only thought I had was "At least 1D or JBiebs didn't win!" I don't have anything against 1D, but they're not as talented as EXO and honestly who still likes Justin Bieber?! To me, double-takes are ridiculous and I absolutely hate them.  The Saints vs Patriots game could not have been helped but the ending to The Scarlet Letter could have been avoided.

Individualism Issues

I always say that we shouldn't conform to society's wishes and that we should express ourselves freely and in the way that we want, but when we see someone who looks a little different or is wearing something funky, generally no one is going to look at them and say, "wow! that's incredible; how unique! Although their style is different " They would probably say something like "What is that person wearing?! Are they serious right now?" Everyone judges each other based on what their first impression of the person, what they are wearing, what they are doing, and how they speak.

In The Scarlet Letter, Hester Prynne is judged on a daily basis because she committed adultery and had a child out of wedlock, which of course was scandalous for that time.  The Puritans in this book not only gossiped about her in their private lives, but they also forced her to wear a scarlet A on her all of her blouses to show the world her sin. That's crazy. I understand that this was in the past in a society that looked down upon many things, but how much have we changed?  Honestly, people are still looked down on because of the dumbest of things.  For example, in India there's still a "hush hush" caste system and people continue to follow it, thinking that they're better than someone else because of the "caste" that they were born into. This is kind of the most ridiculous thing i've ever heard because you can't help what you were born into! If your parents are poor then you're born poor too, but you might have the opportunity to change this and become successful. The Indian Caste system was supposedly abolished after India gained independence from Great Britain in 1947, but that obviously did not work, because even today there is a prominent caste system still in place.  In many African countries, homosexuals are killed because of their sexual preference (which they can't help and which shouldn't be a problem).  I just don't understand why this is a problem, why can't we accept everyone for who they are as people and what they are like?

As a world society we need to learn how to be more accepting of others.  People should be able to freely express themselves without being ostracized, but sadly this won't happen soon enough. There needs to be an international acceptance day (sad that it's not everyday) where we learn to be more accepting of people and hopefully in the future it can be everyday.